This post was last updated more than 1 year ago. Some content may be out of date.
A customer of ours (Morphologic Localisation Ltd), for whom we developed a JIRA addon many years ago to integrate JIRA with their legacy systems, has recently contacted us to help them upgrade their Confluence instance to the latest version. The first question that everyone would have asked was what version of Confluence they had.
The answer was quite shocking: Confluence 2.9. we got excited and afraid at the same time. Last time we saw a similarly old Confluence site was back in 2008 when we installed the first Confluence instance at SonyMusic in Munich.
Our customer was a kind we can wish for any consultant. It was very easy to communicate and to work with them. We did not even had to meet personally, we talked over the phone, used chat, but the trust was established the very first minute. We proposed T&M, they accepted it because they understood the complexity of the process and our arguments. So the job was doomed a happy ending.
When we first entered the Confluence site, we realized that the customer was a heavy user, they built a huge documentation and knowledge base system. Yet the good old Confluence 2.9 was so fast we could not believe my eyes. All pages opened in less than a second, they seemed like static HTML pages. All of this felt very abnormal in today's, modern, resource intensive fatty systems including JIRA and Confluence.
Interestingly Confluence Download Archive still lists almost all versions back to 1.0.3 released in 2004(!). It is very impressive to see how old Confluence is and what a tremendous amount of work and functionality had been incorporated into this product. The below chart shows how the size of Confluence Standalone distribution changed over time. Yes, it started as a 19MB(!) package in 2004. While version 5.9.4 is almost 440MB(!). A 23 times bigger giant.
It as also very astonishing to see how Atlassian imagined the UI back in 2009 when Confluence 2.9 was released. It was so simple, pure, oldish, lack of any eye-candy features. Still we remembered how impressed we were in 2008/9 about the beauty of Confluence UI Atlassian had developed at that time.
We still remembered the old Rich text/wiki markup editor with many-many bugs, limitations, annoying behaviours. Luckily it had passed away and Atlassian developed an uncomparably better editor we can enjoy today.
we wanted to install Confluence 1.0.3 out of pure fun too to see the very first screens, we have found an old evaluation license from 2005 in my MAC account which was accepted by Confluence 1.0.3. However, after configuring database connections, Hibernate threw a bunch of exceptions and Confluence could not complete database initialization. Probably java 1.7 was not good for that. This is how Confluence 1.03 install screens looked like.
Even Confluence 2.9 looked quite funny comparing to what we know Confluence like:
It was obvious that the upgrade cannot be done in a one huge jump from 2.9 to 5.9.4, but rather in three stages as advised by the Confluence Update Documentation.
Our customer wanted not only to upgrade Confluence, but also to move it to totally new server environment replacing the old mysql database with Postgres too. Therefore we have not followed the documentation word-by-word.
There were two aspects that made the upgrade process less complex:
First, we created an XML backup from the old Confluence 2.9.
We selected the latest minor build of 3.5.13 that was downloadable. We manually installed it in the new server environment using an empty Postgresql database.
Once it was running we simply performed a Restore from XML backup. Confluence 3.5.13 could upgrade the content easily without any problems.
The above steps were repeated:
It completed again without any problems.
We felt we were close to a successful upgrade.
Again the well known steps:
All went fine. However all content was imported without attachments.
Confluence 2.9 already stored attachments in the Confluence home directory. However the structure of the attachment directories was totally different from what Confluence 3.5.13 required. In the stage of 2.9 to 3.5.13 the attachments were not converted to the new directory structure.
Luckily this is something that might have happened to others as well. Most probably this was the reason Atlassian added a tricky feature to restructure attachments from the old format to the new, calling: CONFLUENCE_BASE_URL/admin/restructureattachments.jsp
It restructured the directories in a second. Later when I upgraded 3.5.13 to 5.0.3 and then 5.0.3 to 5.9.4, we simply copied the new directory structure over and all was fine. Well, almost. Space logos and user avatars were missing.
Googling the internet for an hour did not yield any useful information. Browsing again and again the old Confluence home directory, we noticed there was a folder called "nonspaced" in the attachment folder, which proved to be relief. After copying it to the server, space logos appeared properly.
However, we could not manage to restore user avatars. We were searching, googling a lot but could not find an answer for the question where Confluence 2.9 stored user avatars.
If you know where user avatars were stored in old Confluence versions, please let us know.
After completing the upgrades, some manual reconfiguration had to be done:
There are a few consequences to draw from the above experience:
Despite the powerful server environment, Confluence 5.9.4 is far from the performance of Confluence 2.9. Yet, none would like to work with the old version. Confluence has emerged to be one of the best tools for collaboration, knowledge management. With its plenty of features, nice user interface, integration capabilities make it a lot more powerful product that is fun to work with.
Ez a bejegyzés több mint 1 éve frissült utoljára, a tartalom bizonyos elemei elavultak lehetnek.
A customer of ours (Morphologic Localisation Ltd), for whom we developed a JIRA addon many years ago to integrate JIRA with their legacy systems, has recently contacted us to help them upgrade their Confluence instance to the latest version. The first question that everyone would have asked was what version of Confluence they had.
The answer was quite shocking: Confluence 2.9. we got excited and afraid at the same time. Last time we saw a similarly old Confluence site was back in 2008 when we installed the first Confluence instance at SonyMusic in Munich.
Our customer was a kind we can wish for any consultant. It was very easy to communicate and to work with them. We did not even had to meet personally, we talked over the phone, used chat, but the trust was established the very first minute. We proposed T&M, they accepted it because they understood the complexity of the process and our arguments. So the job was doomed a happy ending.
When we first entered the Confluence site, we realized that the customer was a heavy user, they built a huge documentation and knowledge base system. Yet the good old Confluence 2.9 was so fast we could not believe my eyes. All pages opened in less than a second, they seemed like static HTML pages. All of this felt very abnormal in today's, modern, resource intensive fatty systems including JIRA and Confluence.
Interestingly Confluence Download Archive still lists almost all versions back to 1.0.3 released in 2004(!). It is very impressive to see how old Confluence is and what a tremendous amount of work and functionality had been incorporated into this product. The below chart shows how the size of Confluence Standalone distribution changed over time. Yes, it started as a 19MB(!) package in 2004. While version 5.9.4 is almost 440MB(!). A 23 times bigger giant.
It as also very astonishing to see how Atlassian imagined the UI back in 2009 when Confluence 2.9 was released. It was so simple, pure, oldish, lack of any eye-candy features. Still we remembered how impressed we were in 2008/9 about the beauty of Confluence UI Atlassian had developed at that time.
We still remembered the old Rich text/wiki markup editor with many-many bugs, limitations, annoying behaviours. Luckily it had passed away and Atlassian developed an uncomparably better editor we can enjoy today.
we wanted to install Confluence 1.0.3 out of pure fun too to see the very first screens, we have found an old evaluation license from 2005 in my MAC account which was accepted by Confluence 1.0.3. However, after configuring database connections, Hibernate threw a bunch of exceptions and Confluence could not complete database initialization. Probably java 1.7 was not good for that. This is how Confluence 1.03 install screens looked like.
Even Confluence 2.9 looked quite funny comparing to what we know Confluence like:
It was obvious that the upgrade cannot be done in a one huge jump from 2.9 to 5.9.4, but rather in three stages as advised by the Confluence Update Documentation.
Our customer wanted not only to upgrade Confluence, but also to move it to totally new server environment replacing the old mysql database with Postgres too. Therefore we have not followed the documentation word-by-word.
There were two aspects that made the upgrade process less complex:
First, we created an XML backup from the old Confluence 2.9.
We selected the latest minor build of 3.5.13 that was downloadable. We manually installed it in the new server environment using an empty Postgresql database.
Once it was running we simply performed a Restore from XML backup. Confluence 3.5.13 could upgrade the content easily without any problems.
The above steps were repeated:
It completed again without any problems.
We felt we were close to a successful upgrade.
Again the well known steps:
All went fine. However all content was imported without attachments.
Confluence 2.9 already stored attachments in the Confluence home directory. However the structure of the attachment directories was totally different from what Confluence 3.5.13 required. In the stage of 2.9 to 3.5.13 the attachments were not converted to the new directory structure.
Luckily this is something that might have happened to others as well. Most probably this was the reason Atlassian added a tricky feature to restructure attachments from the old format to the new, calling: CONFLUENCE_BASE_URL/admin/restructureattachments.jsp
It restructured the directories in a second. Later when I upgraded 3.5.13 to 5.0.3 and then 5.0.3 to 5.9.4, we simply copied the new directory structure over and all was fine. Well, almost. Space logos and user avatars were missing.
Googling the internet for an hour did not yield any useful information. Browsing again and again the old Confluence home directory, we noticed there was a folder called "nonspaced" in the attachment folder, which proved to be relief. After copying it to the server, space logos appeared properly.
However, we could not manage to restore user avatars. We were searching, googling a lot but could not find an answer for the question where Confluence 2.9 stored user avatars.
If you know where user avatars were stored in old Confluence versions, please let us know.
After completing the upgrades, some manual reconfiguration had to be done:
There are a few consequences to draw from the above experience:
Despite the powerful server environment, Confluence 5.9.4 is far from the performance of Confluence 2.9. Yet, none would like to work with the old version. Confluence has emerged to be one of the best tools for collaboration, knowledge management. With its plenty of features, nice user interface, integration capabilities make it a lot more powerful product that is fun to work with.